Historians often debate the causes and effects of events, because history is complex and filled with multiple variables. Some facts are facts: black and white. But most of history is gray: up for interpretation. When analyzing causation, we must remember that we are making a judgement and defending our viewpoint. And remember every viewpoint has opposing or differing viewpoint. Analyzing the effects of historical events requires similar skill. It is not only listing ways the event impacted the nation, for example, it is analyzing historical significance of those effects. Did the effect stem directly from the event? Or was it simply a coincidence in time and place? Was the effect short term or long term? Which cause was most significant? Which effect was most significant? Etc.
Recent Posts
- How Is The Role Of ERP System Different From Traditional TPS, MIS, DSS, And Others
- How Do Management Information Systems Help Managers And Businesses Combat Competitive Rivalry And Increase Overall Success
- Describe The Problem Of Being Stuck In The Middle Of Different Generic Strategies
- What Is “Planned Change” As Compared With Other Types Of Change
- What Can Small Businesses Do To Uphold Ethics And Corporate Social Responsibility
Recent Comments